WebNov 16, 2024 · The case of Kaushal Kishore v. State of UP 2024, highlighted an irony where the judiciary which is regarded as the defender of the constitutional rights, was inventing … Webbelow such rank as the State Government may, by general or special order, prescribe in this behalf, acting on the requisition of such officer, may examine orally any person supposed to be acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Such person shall be bound to answer truly all questions relating to such case put to

Sahoo v/s State of Uttar Pradesh - LawyerServices

WebPETITIONER: SAHOO Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF U.P. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/02/1965 BENCH: SUBBARAO, K. BENCH: SUBBARAO, K. SHAH, J.C. BACHAWAT, R.S. CITATION: 1966 AIR 40 1965 SCR (3) 86 CITATOR INFO : R 1985 SC 48 (15) ACT: Confession--Accused … WebMar 28, 2024 · While terming marital rape exception as regressive and as violating Article 14 and would run counter to the principles of equality (para 25), the Karnataka High Court in … st patrick day parade in houma la

Marital Rape Exemption Can’t Be Absolute And ... - lawyersclubindia

WebApr 4, 2024 · Justice M. Nagaprasanna of the Karnataka High Court on March 23, 2024, in the case of Hrishikesh Sahoo vs State of Karnataka, pronounced the end of the marital … WebFeb 16, 1965 · Sahoo v/s State of Uttar Pradesh Civil Appeal No. 248 of 1964 Decided On, 16 February 1965. At, ... 1963 at 3 p.m. Sahoo was sent up for trial before the Court of … Webreduced to the inferior and degraded state of hearsay.” 23 The Law Commission of India’s 14th Report and 48th Report suggested that confession before high ranking officer should … rotch twitter